The Korean war: another ghost has to be laid to rest – Zhang Lijia

 

Zhang Lijia

China has a lot of historical luggage it has trouble coming to terms with, says author and journalist Zhang Lijia. The Korean was, claimed by China as a victory, is one of major historical issues the country has to come to terms with, she writes in a comment at the South China Morning Post.

Zhang Lijia

Was it a victory as China claimed? Most historians outside the mainland agreed that it was a genuine stalemate, resulting in the 1953 armistice. However, the war was “a powerful vehicle for creating a stronger sense of socialist identity at home”, according to University of Oxford historian Rana Mitter, author of the recently published book China’s Good War. “Mao’s regime used the war as a means of mobilising sentiment within China, helping to increase the wider sense of nationalist feeling.”

I believe the war gave a morale boost to millions of Chinese, in the wake of the humiliation China had suffered at the hands of foreign powers. Having won the respect and fear of its neighbours, China became a major regional power after the war.

Even if it had been a victory, how about its cost? China spent over 10 billion yuan on the war (US$1.5 billion at current exchange rates), a devastating amount for a country that was desperately poor and scarred by a civil war that had just ended. And there was the heavy human cost. According to official figures, nearly 360,000 Chinese soldiers were either killed or wounded, including Mao’s son, Mao Anying. The true death toll could be higher.

The Korean war is thought to be one of the most destructive conflicts in the modern era, with around 3 million casualties. The monumental event deserves to be commemorated and the truth surrounding it needs to be told.

Much more at the South China Morning Post.

Zhang Lijia is a speaker at the China Speakers Bureau. Do you need her at your (online) meeting or conference? Do get in touch or fill in our speakers’ request form.

Are you looking for more stories by Zhang Lijia? Do check out this list.

Trump will stick to symbolic action against China - Arthur Kroeber

Arthur Kroeber

US president Trump seems to have been on a warpath with China. Political analyst Arthur Kroeber, author of China's Economy: What Everyone Needs to Know® expects no real action, but - like mostly - symbolic action against his Mar-a-Lago friend Xi Jinping, he tells in the Chicago Tribune.

The Chicago Tribune:

A downturn in ties was effectively announced on Twitter on June 20, when Trump declared that China's pressure on North Korea had "not worked out." 

Arthur Kroeber, managing director of Gavekal Dragonomics, a consulting and research firm, said Trump may have miscalculated, too. 

"The basic deal Trump thought he offered Xi at the Mar-a-Lago summit — a light touch on trade in exchange for more cooperation on North Korea — was absurdly unrealistic, given China's obvious unwillingness to change its North Korea policy," he wrote in a client note But Kroeber said he still did not expect Trump to embark on a "stupid and self-defeating trade war" with China. 

"The more likely outcome is that he will settle for largely symbolic actions" that will "do little to change trade flows but enable him to crow to his political base that he has got tough with foreigners who are cheating Americans out of production and jobs," he wrote.

More in the Chicago Tribune.

Arthur Kroeber is a speaker at the China Speakers Bureau. Do you need him at your meeting or conference? Do get in touch or fill in our speakers' request form.

Are you looking for more political analysts at the China Speakers Bureau? Do check out this list.

Related articles

• China invites Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner to visit Beijing
• Donald Trump says China's efforts to rein in North Korea have 'not worked'
• China vows to step up patrols after US warship sails near disputed island
• China, California sign climate deal after US backs out of Paris agreement
• In video to China, Branstad sets North Korea as priority