Showing posts with label porn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label porn. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Sex, porn and their lessons for business - Shaun Rein

shaunreinShaun Rein by Fantake via Flickr
Shaun Rein uses the lessons business can learn from the mixed messages the government is sending on porn and sex. On the internet it is porn crackdown all along the line, while sex and prostitution are everywhere commercially available.
The lesson is so obvious, many veterans like Shaun Rein forget to explain it to relative newcomers in China. In Forbes he makes up for that omission, The government is not one monolith with one message, but a conglomerate of competing interests, You have to be aware of this minefield of conflicting interests to survive in China. At a central level - and the internet is strictly controlled by that level - pornography and prostitution are not done.
At the local level police and other officials face different issues. Police and local officials are way underpaid and aren't allowed to move into the private sector after they've reached a certain rank. Even relatively senior local officials often make only several hundred dollars a month. They get lots of benefits, like housing and cars, but they don't have much personal money of their own. One result is that corrupt officials protect brothels for protection fees.
These corrupt officials and police don't want to lose that income, so they let brothels operate freely as long as they don't become hubs for more serious crimes, like drug sales, or violence--and as long as there isn't overwhelming political will to shut things down, as there was around the Beijing Olympics in 2008 and the run up to the World Expo in Shanghai this year. Many brothels throughout the country were shuttered in the three months leading up to the Olympics, but most were up and running again soon after.
More important lessons in Forbes.

Commercial
Shaun Rein is a speaker at the China Speakers Bureau. Do you need him at your meeting or conference? Do get in touch.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Porn is porn in China when you make money

China's latest anti-porn campaign has stretched out to the educational BBS's, the only internet battle it cannot win, says Business Week. Defining what porn exactly is has always been tough, but the educational authorities seems to draw the line when money gets involved. Non commercial sex and communication between individuals does not seem to be at stake.
Business Week quotes an expert from an article in the China Daily:
According to Zhang, the Internet has 370 million sexually explicit websites, and Chinese can get to lots of them, despite the best efforts of the government. Says the China Daily: “Zhang, who has studied sex education for 16 years, said Web sites should cater to the needs of juveniles and improve their environment because 'it is impossible to block all the unhealthy information on the Internet.'"
The crackdown seems to be a rather symbolic one.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Baidu Japan blocked

The new Japanese service of China's largest search engine Baidu, got blocked, discovered Yee today. We already started the count-down at the end of March as we discovered large amounts of soft porn on this new service. You can get to the porn from China when you use a proxy like here, a test we did only for scientific reasons.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

China global leader in porn revenue?

Figures and China are a difficult combination, I have argued more than once. But this is an interesting one. According to this research China is leading in porn, followed by South-Korea, Japan and only then the US.
The total revenue stream for China is US$27.4 billion and that results in a per capita expenditure of about US$ 27. Why is that number not true? First, the porn industry is illegal, so whatever there might be in revenue will be very hard to verify.
Second, that illegal porn is free or very cheap. If you are in China, just look out of the window: do you see somebody passing by who would spend 300 Renminbi on porn? Seems very unlikely.
As a former historian I checked of course the footnotes, but the researcher only says they come from reliable sources. Yes, of course. Like his research.